ARC Raiders utilizes generative AI technology to create voice lines that have been trained on professional actors. The focus now shifts towards establishing boundaries in this practice.
Embark Studios has incorporated AI assistance in developing their voice lines, with input from actual humans. This raises the question of distinguishing between genuine machine learning and subpar results, and determining ethical standards.
AI has emerged as a dominant force in various sectors like sales, technology infrastructure, device manufacturing, and gaming. In an era of cost-efficiency, AI is commonly employed not only to save costs but also time and effort due to the high demand for instant gratification.
Is AI perceived as a looming threat or something else entirely? Could it potentially stifle human creativity, relegating artistic talents to the background in favor of power-hungry technological advancements? Or is it a progressive step facilitated by human intervention rather than natural evolution?
The position of AI on this nonlinear spectrum warrants a complex discussion which cannot be fully explored in this piece alone. The aim here is to initiate an ongoing dialogue that can evolve over time and lead to valuable insights.
It is widely known that AI has the capacity to replace traditional creative roles with outcomes deemed as substandard by many. Generative AI relies on existing content to generate new materials based on predefined rules, essentially recycling existing work into supposedly fresh creations.
In the context of gaming, this approach enables developers to introduce various features without the need for additional resources or expediting development timelines. These features may include textures, animations, voice lines, and written code.
According to information provided on the Steam page for ARC Raiders by Embark Studios, AI tools are utilized during the development process for both ARC and The Finals. The studio emphasizes that while these tools aid in content creation, the final product still reflects the originality and creativity of their development team.
Furthermore, Embark Studios has openly discussed its utilization of AI through multiple interviews, shedding light on the rationale behind their decision.
For instance, Embark Studios incorporates AI for tasks such as Procedural Animation, Text-to-Speech (TTS), and Enemy AI within ARC Raiders.
In my review of ARC Raiders, I did not delve into this aspect extensively as it was not a primary concern. Although I noticed some discrepancies in the dialogue, I did not attribute them directly to AI but rather focused on evaluating core gameplay elements.
Critics argue about the implications set by this trend. If actors receive upfront payment for their work without needing further involvement in creating additional voice lines, does this practice undermine opportunities for others in the industry? The answer remains subjective.
As one fellow gamer aptly put it during our gameplay session, Embark Studios employs AI as a tool to enhance creativity rather than replacing human ingenuity entirely. Their intention is not to substitute human input with AI but to augment creative capabilities efficiently.
The predicament lies in how AI poses a threat to traditional avenues of creativity. As generative AI consumes existing content instead of fostering novel ideas, it diminishes the necessity for innovation beyond its own scope.
In contrast to earlier practices where pottery was crafted solely by hand without external aids, advancements led to the introduction of various tools enhancing creative processes significantly.
If AI streamlines certain aspects like voice line creation while maintaining significant human oversight from inception to completion, does it truly pose a detrimental impact? While there is no definitive answer at present, it is imperative that we engage in these discussions proactively.
Given that AI is poised to remain prevalent in our future landscape, it becomes crucial to address concerns regarding its ethical deployment. Completely barring its usage is impractical; therefore, deliberating on appropriate applications becomes essential moving forward.
Rather than outright rejection without consideration, it is time we engage in constructive conversations regarding where and how AI can be effectively integrated into various domains.
While acknowledging potential dissenting views that may arise from differing perspectives, this piece aims not merely to critique popular trends but rather toY spark meaningful dialogue challenging assumptions about an inevitable decline into mediocrity.