WIRED’s top executive is making a plea for brevity. Despite multiple attempts to avoid the task, they expressed that not every editorial package necessitates an editor’s letter. The executive cited various engagements such as recording a podcast, preparing for a tech conference, personal responsibilities, and general busyness as reasons for their reluctance. Their subtle communication tactic of ignoring emails from their editor was unsuccessful in conveying their message effectively.

The executive highlighted their lack of interest in WIRED having an AI manifesto, emphasizing the overwhelming inquiries they have received about covering AI since joining the company in July 2023. They noted the persistent questioning from various individuals and entities about their stance on AI, ranging from industry professionals to family members. While acknowledging the utility of generative AI in certain contexts, they underscored its limitations and cautioned against exaggerating its significance.

Regarding journalism, the executive questioned whether generative AI poses a threat to traditional news-gathering practices. They critiqued tech giants like Google and Meta for their impact on the media industry and expressed skepticism about AI’s potential to replace human creativity and storytelling skills.

In terms of WIRED’s approach to AI, the executive mentioned using AI for specific tasks like copyediting and research while emphasizing the irreplaceable value of human creativity in journalism. They encouraged WIRED readers to familiarize themselves with AI tools but cautioned against excessive reliance on technology at the expense of human expertise.

In conclusion, the executive advised maintaining a balanced perspective on AI, acquiring basic knowledge about it without becoming overly enamored with or dependent on it. They stressed the importance of preserving human involvement in essential aspects of life, such as education and creative expression, amidst technological advancements.